Windows 8 Developer Preview on AMD Tablets

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 09:03:25 PM. © Daring Fireball

This Is My Next has pictures and a video showing the Windows 8 developer preview running on ARM tablets — but they’re tablets originally designed to run Windows 7.

Correction: These aren’t ARM. I saw “AMD” and read “ARM” — my bad. Total brain-o on my end, since the whole Windows-on-ARM thing is new to Windows 8. There are no existing Windows ARM tablets.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://thisismynext.com/2011/09/14/windows-8-amd-fusion-tablets/

Digg this

Here Is Windows 8 Running on an ARM Tablet

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 09:03:25 PM. © Daring Fireball

For realsies this time.

Contrary to [my just-posted theory] that Windows 8 might (and I say, should) go Metro-only on ARM tablets, this unit does have the traditional Windows desktop. The OS is still just a developer beta, though.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://thisismynext.com/2011/09/14/nvidia-kal-el-windows-8-tablet-hands-on/

Digg this

Metro

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 07:03:47 PM. © Daring Fireball

I don’t think there’s any hyperbole in Microsoft’s claim that this is “Windows Reimagined”. But it’s not so much that Windows 8 is Windows reimagined, but Metro that is Windows reimagined. It’s truly a whole new concept in how a computer interface should look and work.

Metro is to Microsoft what iOS is to Apple — starting over from scratch, carrying no legacy baggage or expectations. Windows 8’s “Desktop”, the traditional Windows interface, is like Mac OS X. The big difference, obviously, is that Apple has clearly separated the two, and Microsoft has put them together.

I’m no more interested in the Windows 8 desktop than I ever have been in Windows, but Metro is definitely interesting. I’ve been thinking all along that I’d rather Microsoft have let Metro stand alone as a next-generation OS, separate from Windows. (Like with Windows Phone, the name “Windows” is no longer even apt, as the Metro UI doesn’t use any actual, you know, windows.¹) I’m hung up on the question of how any OS that lets you do everything Windows does could compete with the iPad, because the iPad’s appeal and success is largely forged by the advantages that come from not allowing you to do so many of the things Mac OS X can do.

One big example: On the Mac and Windows, a lot of stuff is always going on in the background. Once launched, apps stay running, consume CPU time, and hold onto RAM until the user quits them. On the iPad, very little is going on in the background — only essential system services — and apps get no CPU time and are eventually flushed from RAM when they’re not frontmost. These restrictions prevent the iPad from doing all sorts of things a Mac can do. You can’t use an iPad as a media server. You can’t screen share or remotely log into an iPad. You can’t use an iPad as a web server. An iPad app can’t work on a lengthy task in the background while you do other things in the foreground. But an iPad runs for double-digit hours on a single charge with a lightweight battery and never even gets warm let alone hot.

Tradeoffs. Mutually exclusive tradeoffs. Separate devices are required. You can’t force Mac apps to follow iOS background processing restrictions without eliminating all the good and useful things we ask Macs to do in the background. You can ask Mac apps to behave like iOS apps, which is what Lion’s Automatic Termination feature does, but it has to be opt-in. And you can’t give iOS apps even the option to run continuously in the background without sacrificing battery life and foreground app performance. But that’s how Microsoft has positioned Metro for tablets — a modern touch interface that carries the full CPU and RAM consumption of Windows as we know it. That have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too attitude is what I didn’t get with Microsoft’s positioning Metro as its answer to the iPad.

But it occurred to me while watching Jensen Harris’s Metro overview at Build that Microsoft might be sandbagging us on this. It’s so obvious that you can’t have your cake and eat it too on iPad-caliber devices. So my big what-if realization is this: I think Metro will only run alongside the traditional Windows desktop on Intel PCs. On ARM devices, there will only be Metro. Microsoft might call it “Windows” but they call everything “Windows”. To put it in Apple-centric terms, it’s going to be like if Mac OS X could run iPad apps, but iPads could still only run iPad apps. Metro everywhere, not Windows everywhere.

Microsoft hasn’t come out and said this (at least that I’ve seen), but they do seem to be hinting at it:

Speaking at Microsoft’s Build developer conference, Windowschief Steven Sinofsky flatly ruled out the possibility of thecompany offering support for legacy Windows applications withWindows 8 on ARM.
“We’re not going to port the installed base of x86 applications toARM. They don’t take advantage of the things that make ARM a greatarchitecture,” he said, referring to the power-efficiency ofARM-based processors in mobile devices such as tablets.

I had been reading statements like this as meaning that they wouldn’t be doing Rosetta-style emulation of x86 software on ARM (I’m not even sure that’d be possible, performance-wise, but then again, I didn’t think Rosetta was possible either), but that developers would be able to recompile traditional Windows apps for ARM. Now I’m thinking what they mean is more profound: that on ARM, Metro will be the only Windows interface.

It’s worth noting that Metro is more than just a new look, and more than just putting touch first. Metro apps have similar restrictions to iOS apps. According to Jensen Harris, for example, Metro apps will get “about five seconds” after they’re no longer on-screen before the system puts them into a suspended state. There’s no file manager. Users no longer quit (or, in Windows parlance, exit) apps explicitly. These tradeoffs sound familiar?

So I hereby amend my punditry. Windows 8 with the full Windows desktop will never be an iPad rival. But a version of Windows 8 with nothing but Metro looks like an excellent design for an iPad rival.

Thinking about it, isn’t window an odd word choice for what we call movable, stackable, resizeable content regions in a user interface? Other than being rectangular they’re not like real-world windows at all. I suppose they’re like a metaphorical window onto your content, but that’s a stretch. I’m having one of these moments here like when a familiar word suddenly looks totally weird and wrong. ↩

Read The Full Article:
http://daringfireball.net/2011/09/metro

Digg this

Windows 8 Developer Preview on ARM Tablets

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 07:03:47 PM. © Daring Fireball

This Is My Next has pictures and a video showing the Windows 8 developer preview running on ARM tablets — but they’re tablets originally designed to run Windows 7.

Notable is that the traditional Windows desktop interface is present. I’m not sure this disproves my mere-minutes-ago-posted theory that Windows 8 might go Metro-only on ARM hardware. This is just a developer preview of the OS, not the shipping version.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://thisismynext.com/2011/09/14/windows-8-amd-fusion-tablets/

Digg this

George Lucas Strikes Back

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 07:03:47 PM. © Daring Fireball

This explains it all.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BMgegut3UM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Digg this

Not About Steve

post from Daring Fireball on 14 September 2011 06:04:06 PM. © Daring Fireball

Guy English:

There?s been a lot written about Steve leaving Apple. I?m moreconcerned about Steve leaving the industry.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://kickingbear.com/blog/archives/220

Digg this

Game Play Inc releases Popcorn Stop! An App To
Get Popcorn Exactly Right

post from prMac on 14 September 2011 05:53:00 PM. © prMac

Game Play Inc has introduced Popcorn Stop 1.0, for iOS devices. An app used to get popcorn exactly right. This app helps you to get your microwave popcorn perfectly right. No more listening to the microwave. Popcorn Stop has fine tune controls for sensitivity and gap time. Adjust the sensitivity to improve pop detection. Adjust the gap time for optimal pop count. It listens to the microwave oven, hears the popping and gives clear auditive and visual feedback when the popcorn is ready.

Read The Full Article:
http://prmac.com/release-id-30748.htm

Digg this

The Çingleton Symposium

Small, smart, two-day conference next month in beautiful Montréal, Québec, more or less focusing on where this whole racket is going. I’d say it’s a great lineup of speakers, but that’d be self-serving, so I won’t. This is the only speaking engagement on my calendar, but alas, it’s already sold out.

?

Read The Full Article:
http://çingleton.com/

Digg this

VivaKids' ABC, Amazing, Brilliant, Captivating

Renowned designer and director Ulrike Kerber of Viva Design and Award winning app developer 1K Studios is pleased to have announced VivaKids' ABC, an app that gives kids an artful, expressive, organic way to learn the alphabet on iPad. This artistically dynamic app brings each letter to life with its stop motion animation. Not only do the videos present the alphabet in an engaging way, they focus on phonics, which provides children with the tools to learn the proper pronunciation of each letter.

Read The Full Article:
http://prmac.com/release-id-30861.htm

Digg this