Intel takes on antitrust expert as general
counsel

post from Macnn | The Macintosh News Network on 13 November 2009 02:20:00 PM. © Macnn | The Macintosh News Network

Intel today addressed its ongoing legal troubles with word that it has hired Douglas Melamed as both...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.macnn.com/click.phdo?i=8b15403eac78e5a325e711b8f514faa5

Digg this

Element : iPhone Home Screen Concept Turns to
Reality

post from iHackintosh on 13 November 2009 01:38:27 PM. © iHackintosh

In September Geoff Teehan from Teehan+Lax has posted his vision for the iPhone Home Screen. Basically the design allows you to create a scrollable home screen of the stuff that matters to you. By default it may track things like missed calls, unread[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ihackintoshfeed/~3/UvsVC_1BbiU/

Digg this

The Airfoil Speakers Touch Situation

post from Daring Fireball on 13 November 2009 01:36:00 PM. © Daring Fireball

Regarding today’s aforelinked tale from Rogue Amoeba regarding the four-month-long process to get a minor bug-fix update to Airfoil Speakers Touch published on the App Store, several readers who insist upon defending Apple in this matter have pointed me to [Jeff LaMarche’s response]. LaMarche writes:

I’m going to risk the ire of the maddening crowd once more, but I think somebody needs to come to Apple’s defense this time. I love a good mob scene as much as the next guy, and I keep my pitchfork nice and sharp just in case the need should arise. But? the picture that Rogue Amoeba has painted in their farewell post doesn’t look quite so black and white to me. Certainly, Apple could have handled many things about the situation better, but so could have Rogue Amoeba. Let’s strip it down to the basics.

Airfoil Speakers Touch included pictures of Apple products;

These were images owned by Apple;

The iPhone SDK Agreement specifically prohibits the use of images, icons, and logos owned by Apple in iPhone applications;

The first rejection clearly and unambiguously stated why the app was being rejected and how it could be fixed.

There is much that is wrong with LaMarche’s synopsis.

Point 1 is simply wrong; the Airfoil Speakers Touch iPhone app does not contain any of these images. It contains no pictures of Apple computers. It contains no icons of Apple applications. It displays these images after they are sent across the network by Airfoil for Mac. Airfoil for Mac reads these images using public official Mac OS X APIs. I.e. Airfoil Speakers Touch can only show a picture of the Mac it is connected to because the image is sent from the Mac it is connected to.

Point 3, I disagree with. I’ve just re-read the entire iPhone SDK Agreement (again), and I find no clause that prohibits what Airfoil Speakers Touch was doing. Here’s section 3.2 (d), which is perhaps what LaMarche is referring to (bold emphasis added):¹

(d) To the best of Your knowledge and belief, Your Application and Licensed Application Information do not and will not violate, misappropriate, or infringe any Apple or third party copyrights, trademarks, rights of privacy and publicity, trade secrets, patents, or other proprietary or legal rights (e.g. musical composition or performance rights, video rights, photography or image rights, logo rights, third party data rights, etc. for content and materials that may be included in Your Application);

One can argue that Airfoil Speakers Touch is somehow “violating”, “misappropriating”, or “infringing” on Apple trademarks here. I would strongly disagree, and argue instead that Airfoil Speakers Touch was using these images very much appropriately. And note that the SDK agreement does not state you cannot “use” Apple trademarks.

There’s also section 2.6:

This Agreement does not grant You any rights to use any trademarks, logos or service marks belonging to Apple, including but not limited to the iPhone or iPod word marks. If You make reference to any Apple products or technology or use Apple?s trademarks, You agree to comply with the published guidelines at http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/guidelinesfor3rdparties.html, as modified by Apple from time to time.

This clearly suggests that iPhone apps can make use of Apple trademarks, if they comply with the terms of Apple’s guidelines. I’ve read that document, too, and see no clause therein which would suggest that what Airfoil Speakers Touch was doing was in violation of the guidelines.

In his write-up regarding the situation, Rogue Amoeba’s Paul Kafasis includes this bit from their App Store rejection notice:

Apple Logo and Apple-owned Graphic Symbols:

You may not use the Apple Logo or any other Apple-owned graphic symbol, logo, or icon on or in connection with web sites, products, packaging, manuals, promotional/advertising materials, or for any other purpose except pursuant to an express written trademark license from Apple, such as a reseller agreement.

That’s less ambiguous. However, note that this language is not contained within the SDK agreement itself. The only way Rogue Amoeba got this language was by designing, building, and submitting the application that did it. (And this gets to LaMarche’s fourth point, wherein he claims the notice was “unambiguous”. It was not. It did not state where Rogue Amoeba had violated this rule. Was it the Mac icons? The app icons? Both? Rogue Amoeba was left to guess — and, when they asked for clarification, left to wait.)

Is Apple within their rights to reject this app for this reason? Sure. The bottom line is that they can reject apps for whatever reasons they want — that’s the rule that matters here. But was Rogue Amoeba foolish for designing their application this way? No. There’s nothing in the SDK agreement that they’ve violated.

It’s just good design. In UI design, just as in cinema, it is almost always better to show rather than tell. How else can you show which computer the Airfoil iPhone client is connected to? Apple certainly agrees with the design — showing an icon of the machine is exactly how their own Remote app solves the same UI problem. Obviously, the iPhone Remote app is Apple’s own app, so they can’t be accused of violating/misappropriating/infringing their own trademark. But if the de facto rule is “Apple can show a representation of the computer its iPhone apps connect to, but third-party developers can’t”, that doesn’t exactly refute Rogue Amoeba’s conclusion that developing for this platform just isn’t worth it.

I can’t link to the SDK agreement, as it resides behind the iPhone Developer Portal. ↩

Read The Full Article:
http://daringfireball.net/2009/11/airfoil_touch_situation

Digg this

ioSafe outs 2TB fireproof, waterproof external
hard drive

post from Macnn | The Macintosh News Network on 13 November 2009 01:35:00 PM. © Macnn | The Macintosh News Network

ioSafe on Thursday added a new flagship to its Solo lineup of desktop hard drives through a 2TB vers...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.macnn.com/click.phdo?i=2a234f42ea0773b642f4c7027f633eda

Digg this

Beer Distorts Reality On The iPhone

post from prMac on 13 November 2009 01:20:00 PM. © prMac

Alakazapps today is proud to announce Magic Beer Bottle 1.0, a beer simulator that literally comes off the screen. After demonstrating what looks like a normal iPhone 'beer app', the performer of the trick can literally pluck the top off the bottle - it becomes real in their fingertips. Beer simulators have existed since the dawn of the App Store, Magic Beer Bottle takes the concept to the next level.

Read The Full Article:
http://prmac.com/release-id-8593.htm

Digg this

Prizmo 1.2 adds scanner integration with Snow
Leopard

post from Macnn | The Macintosh News Network on 13 November 2009 01:05:00 PM. © Macnn | The Macintosh News Network

Creaceed has introduced Prizmo 1.2, a new version of its Mac OCR software for users with digital cam...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.macnn.com/click.phdo?i=95d4d97fab1206e0bc97c745eb7bc8d6

Digg this

Best Buy's Black Friday deals revealed

post from Macnn | The Macintosh News Network on 13 November 2009 01:05:00 PM. © Macnn | The Macintosh News Network

The flyer for Best Buy's Black Friday/Thanksgiving sale has been leaked on the Internet ahead of its...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.macnn.com/click.phdo?i=47c81c53386bb72d6d9e942d15a40a46

Digg this

Eliminate Pro Becomes First Free App in the Top
Grossing List

post from TheAppleBlog on 13 November 2009 01:00:00 PM. © TheAppleBlog

eliminate_pro I’m not sure how many of you are playing Eliminate Pro on your iPhones, but I’m guessing it has to be a fairly high number, considering the app’s success since its recent launch. ngmoco’s ambitious first-person shooter for Apple’s mobile platform is third overall in the App Store’s Top Free list, but what’s more impressive is the number 22 spot it currently occupies in the Top Grossing list of apps.

That’s a huge step for the micropayments business model made possible by the introduction of in-app purchasing in iPhone OS 3.0. It marks the first real evidence that developers can make good money offering a “freemium” model on the iPhone platform, with users getting the initial product for free, but paying for in-game rewards and additional content.

ngmoco appears to have found the sweet spot in add-on content where users don’t feel like they’re being extorted by a game’s in-app purchasing system. Eliminate Pro uses a system in which players earn rewards for in-game achievements that can be used to purchase armor and weapon upgrades. The catch is that you only get a certain amount of time during which game play earns you points. You can keep playing for free, but in order to get more rewards, you have to pay for more usable time.

Users can buy blocks of active time using the in-app purchasing system, in $1, $10 and $30 dollar increments. Players seem to have taken a shine to the system, since in-app purchases alone account for all of Eliminate Pro’s gross revenue. ngmoco also has a strong community and social media promotions effort in place behind the new title.

The company’s other title that depends heavily on in-app commerce, Touch Pets Dogs, hasn’t yet mirrored the success of Eliminate Pro. It hasn’t been available in the U.S. store for quite as long as Eliminate Pro, but I suspect the fact that its target audience skews much younger has more to do with its weaker performance. Eliminate players are far more likely to be in a position to have access to a pay-capable iTunes account.

No doubt ngmoco and other developers will try to repeat the success of Eliminate with other apps based on the same model. Personally, I’d be happy to see more games along the same lines, so long as developers remember that “freemium” does not mean “artificially handicapped.” Eliminate Pro works so well because it’s fun even if you don’t make use of the in-app purchases. As a result, users feel that ngmoco is operating in good faith and are willing to spend money on enhancing their experience.

Read The Full Article:
http://theappleblog.com/2009/11/13/eliminate-pro-becomes-first-free-app-in-the-to
p-grossing-list/

Digg this

Presented By:

Read The Full Article:
http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=b6652303150d28eea835c103e9c9da14&p=4

Digg this

Bill Gates commends Steve Jobs for salvaging
Apple

Former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates, speaking on a Thursday-night CNBC program, is noted to have complim...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.macnn.com/click.phdo?i=b6652303150d28eea835c103e9c9da14